A Long-Overdue Rethink of Audit Requirements
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs is considering a major reform: exempting companies with turnover up to ₹1 crore from mandatory statutory audits. If cleared in the upcoming Winter Session, this will be the biggest recalibration of audit norms since the Companies Act revamp. For years, India’s smallest companies have been subject to the same audit obligations as mid-sized corporates, even when their operations are simple, their accounting is straightforward, and their financial footprint is minimal. Recognising this mismatch is both rational and necessary.
The Compliance Cost Is Disproportionate for Micro-Enterprises
A statutory audit typically costs between ₹25,000 and ₹75,000 — a significant sum for a micro-company or a bootstrapped startup still finding its footing. These businesses often operate on razor-thin margins, yet they are expected to spend more on mandatory audits than on annual secretarial filings, tax compliances, and bookkeeping combined. When there are no external shareholders, lenders, or public-facing risks, the audit often adds little real governance value. The proposed exemption does not weaken accountability; it simply ensures that compliance requirements are proportionate to the scale and complexity of the enterprise. Regulation loses credibility when it becomes more burdensome than the business it seeks to regulate.
A Boost to Formalisation and Ease of Doing Business
There is a misconception that removing mandatory audits will encourage laxity. In reality, high compliance costs are a key reason entrepreneurs avoid incorporating companies, opting instead for proprietorships or partnerships. By easing the compliance burden, MCA is encouraging more businesses to enter the formal corporate structure. A similar behavioural shift was visible in the GST regime: when compliance became economically rational, registrations surged. Reducing friction makes the private limited model more accessible and attractive, especially for first-generation entrepreneurs.
Global Practice Follows a Proportionate Approach
Most advanced economies exempt small companies from statutory audits based on turnover or size thresholds. The UK exempts companies up to £10.2 million; Singapore up to SGD 10 million; the EU applies similar thresholds. India’s existing rule — compulsory audits regardless of turnover — is an outlier. Raising the threshold to ₹1 crore is a modest, sensible step toward global alignment. It acknowledges that governance must operate on principles of materiality and risk, not uniformity.
Freeing Up Audit Capacity Where It Matters Most
A hidden advantage of the exemption is that it will relieve audit professionals from low-value, low-risk engagements. CA firms across India are overextended, spending time on small-company audits that contribute little to systemic oversight. Redirecting audit capacity toward larger, more complex, and regulated entities strengthens the overall governance landscape. It ensures that professional effort is spent where the stakes are higher.
Financial Transparency Will Still Be Ensured
The absence of a statutory audit does not mean an absence of financial discipline. Small companies will continue to comply with GST filings, TDS/TCS obligations, income tax returns, MCA annual filings, bank scrutiny, and digital accounting trails. India’s digital compliance architecture ensures that companies remain visible and trackable even without a mandatory audit. In many cases, digital systems provide better real-time oversight than an annual audit.
A Reform That Supports Growth
The proposed exemption is a thoughtful correction — one that balances oversight with practicality. It aligns regulatory effort with economic reality, encourages more businesses to formalise, and reduces unnecessary friction for micro-enterprises. For a country aiming to nurture entrepreneurship and improve ease of doing business, this reform is not just welcome; it is essential.
